
Rating Methodology
CarbonGrade ratings are derived from a structured and consistently applied evaluation model
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
CarbonGrade ratings are issued under a defined internal rating methodology designed to evaluate corporate carbon performance and reporting robustness at organizational level.
The framework establishes:
- Scoring architecture
- Evaluation indicators
- Weighting structure
- Classification thresholds (A–E)
- Interpretation rules.
Ratings reflect both carbon intensity positioning and data integrity quality within the defined reporting scope.
SCOPE OF EVALUATION
CarbonGrade ratings:
- Are issued at organizational level
- Are valid for a defined reporting year
- Are based exclusively on documented disclosures submitted by the rated organization
- Reflect carbon performance relative to sector positioning
- Incorporate methodological robustness and transparency criteria
CarbonGrade does not provide certification. Ratings represent structured classification outcomes under the CarbonGrade framework.
EVALUATION PROCESS
The assessment process follows a defined and consistent sequence:
- Submission of documented carbon inventory and supporting disclosures
- Documentation review and completeness verification
- Indicator-based scoring under the defined architecture
- Application of classification thresholds
- Issuance of rating outcome (A–E)
All rating decisions are derived exclusively from submitted documentation and internal scoring criteria.
CLASSIFICATION MODEL
CarbonGrade applies a structured five-level classification structure:
A — Leading
High carbon performance and strong data robustness.
B — Strong
Above-average performance with minor methodological limitations.
C — Baseline
Performance aligned with sector norms.
D — Weak
Below-average performance or structural limitations.
E — Insufficient
Material data integrity gaps or incomplete reporting.
Final classification results from structured internal scoring.
METHODOLOGICAL INTEGRITY
The CarbonGrade methodology is structured, version-controlled, consistently applied and publicly referenced.
Methodological updates, when applicable, are documented and applied prospectively.
